How do you rank these boxers based on being overrated champions?

Been a while, interesting question it's good to be back. I consider both Badomir and Diaz decent fighters who had the ability in their careers to fight at a championship level with some success. The rest were solid fighters, but not what I would consider championship material. Given the political state of boxing, it's difficult to take any "championship belt" seriously, one must look at a particular fighter]s over all career performance and measure him against his competition not just the hardware he collects along the way. I define a champion as a fighter who beat the best of his era, and in that regard none of these guys would really fit the criteria, but Diaz and Baldomir along with Santos are in my opinion the best of the group followed by Witter and Alvarez. I was never really impressed with the rest but would put Malignaggi, Corley, N'Dou Foreman and Dzinzirulk at the lower part of my list.